Skip to main content

Bufford v. CENTURYLINK

E.D.N.C.December 10, 2010No. 5:09-cv-559
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
James C. Dever III
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The court granted in part and denied in part the defendant's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff's Title VII and § 1981 claims for failure to hire based on race were allowed to proceed, but her state law claim under N.C. Gen.Stat. § 143-422.2 was dismissed with prejudice.

What This Ruling Means

**What This Case Was About** Tiara Bufford sued her potential employer, Embarq Management Corporation (part of CenturyLink), claiming they refused to hire her because of her race. She filed discrimination claims under federal civil rights laws and North Carolina state law, arguing the company's hiring decision was based on racial bias rather than her qualifications. **What the Court Decided** The court had mixed results on Bufford's lawsuit. The judge allowed her main discrimination claims to move forward under Title VII (the federal workplace discrimination law) and Section 1981 (a federal civil rights law). However, the court dismissed her claim under North Carolina state discrimination law, ruling it had no merit and could not be refiled. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows that workers who believe they faced hiring discrimination because of race have multiple legal options. Even if one type of claim gets thrown out, federal civil rights laws may still provide protection. Workers should know that discrimination can happen during the hiring process, not just after being hired. If you suspect you were passed over for a job due to your race, federal laws may give you grounds to challenge that decision in court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.