Skip to main content

Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. Thompson Coburn LLP

Ill. App. Ct.June 3, 2010No. 5-08-0497Cited 28 times
Plaintiff WinThompson Coburn LLP$3,654,606.4 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Wexstten
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
jury verdict

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Union Planters Bank (formerly Magna Trust Company) prevailed in its legal malpractice and breach of contract claims against its former law firm Thompson Coburn LLP, obtaining a jury verdict for $3,654,606.40 in damages related to malpractice in transactional work regarding trust termination.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Union Planters Bank sued their former law firm, Thompson Coburn LLP, claiming the lawyers made serious mistakes while handling legal work related to ending a trust arrangement. The bank argued that the law firm failed to do their job properly and breached their contract to provide competent legal services. This wasn't about employment issues directly, but rather about professional services and accountability. **What the Court Decided** A jury sided with Union Planters Bank and awarded them over $3.6 million in damages. The court found that Thompson Coburn LLP was guilty of legal malpractice and had indeed breached their contract with the bank. The substantial monetary award reflected the significant financial harm caused by the law firm's errors. **Why This Matters for Workers** While this case involved a bank suing a law firm rather than traditional employment issues, it demonstrates an important principle: professionals can be held accountable when they fail to meet their contractual obligations and professional standards. For workers, this reinforces that service providers—whether lawyers, consultants, or other professionals—have legal duties to perform their work competently and can face serious financial consequences when they don't.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Union Planters Bank, N.A. v. Thompson Coburn LLP from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.