Skip to main content

Rice v. Astrue

S.D. IowaAugust 16, 2007No. 3:06-cv-00026
Defendant WinAstrue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Pratt
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Iowa

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The Administrative Law Judge denied Kevin Rice's application for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits, finding that while he had severe impairments, he retained residual functional capacity for sedentary work and unskilled jobs were available to him in the national economy.

What This Ruling Means

**Rice v. Astrue: Social Security Disability Benefits Denied** This case involved Kevin Rice, who applied for Social Security Disability Insurance benefits, claiming he was unable to work due to his medical conditions. Rice believed his impairments were severe enough to prevent him from holding any job, making him eligible for disability benefits from the Social Security Administration. The Administrative Law Judge ruled against Rice and denied his application for benefits. While the judge acknowledged that Rice did have serious medical impairments, the court found that he still had enough physical and mental ability to perform sedentary (sit-down) work. The judge determined that there were unskilled jobs available in the national economy that Rice could still perform despite his limitations. This ruling matters for workers because it shows how strict the standards are for qualifying for Social Security Disability benefits. Even when someone has significant health problems, they may still be denied benefits if the government determines they can perform any type of work, even limited desk jobs. Workers should understand that having a medical condition doesn't automatically qualify them for disability benefits – they must prove they cannot perform any substantial work activity due to their impairments.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.