Skip to main content

Teresa R. v. Madison Metropolitan School District

W.D. Wis.May 20, 2009No. 08-cv-427-bbc
Plaintiff WinMadison Metropolitan School District$18,766.16 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Barbara B. Crabb
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
440 Civil rights other
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
attorney fees award

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to Accommodate

Outcome

Plaintiffs obtained partial reimbursement for preschool tuition under the IDEA and were determined to be prevailing parties eligible for attorney fees. The court awarded reduced attorney fees after adjusting for partial success and market rate corrections.

What This Ruling Means

**Teresa R. v. Madison Metropolitan School District: Court Rules in Favor of Parent Over Special Education Services** This case involved a dispute between a parent (Teresa R.) and the Madison Metropolitan School District over special education services for her child. The parent claimed the school district failed to provide appropriate accommodations under federal disability laws, specifically the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), which requires schools to provide proper educational services for children with disabilities. The court sided with the parent, finding that the school district had indeed failed to meet its obligations. As a result, the court ordered the school district to reimburse the family $18,766.16 for preschool tuition costs they had to pay out of pocket when the district didn't provide adequate services. The court also determined that the parent was entitled to have the school district pay her attorney fees since she won the case. This ruling matters for workers, particularly those who are parents of children with disabilities. It reinforces that school districts must follow federal law in providing special education services, and when they fail to do so, families can seek reimbursement for costs they incur finding alternative services. Parents who successfully challenge school districts can also recover their legal costs.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
People in re S.L. and A.L
COLOCTAPPDec 2017

The Rio Blanco County Department of Human Services (Department) became involved with the parents in this case as a result of concerns about the children's welfare due to the condition of the family home, the parents' use of methamphetamine, and criminal cases involving the parents. Attempts at voluntary services failed, and on the Department's petition for dependency and neglect, the district court ultimately terminated the parents' rights. On appeal, the parents contended that the Department failed to make reasonable efforts to reunify them with their children. Specifically, the parents contended that the Department did not give them sufficient time to complete the services under their treatment plans and failed to accommodate their drug testing needs. The termination hearing was not held until more than a year after the motion to terminate was filed. For nine months before the motion to terminate was filed, the Department provided numerous services to the parents, including substance abuse therapy, therapeutic visitation supervision, drug abuse monitoring, and a parental capacity evaluation. The Department also provided counseling for the children. Both parents missed drug tests and tested positive during the testing period, and both were arrested for possession of methamphetamine during the pendency of the case. The Department made reasonable accommodations to meet the parents' needs and the parents had sufficient time to comply with their treatment plans. The record supports the trial court's findings that termination was appropriate because (1) the court-approved appropriate treatment plan had not been complied with by the parents or had not been successful in rehabilitating them (2) the parents were unfit and (3) the conduct or condition of the parents was unlikely to change within a reasonable time. Father also contended that the trial court's decision to interview the 9-year-old twin children together in chambers fundamentally and seriously affected the basi

Defendant Win
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Plaintiff Win
James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health Lab
9th CircuitNov 2000
Mixed Result
Wright
10th CircuitAug 2001
Defendant Win

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.