Skip to main content

Graphic Communications International Union, Local 31-N v. Quebecor Printing (USA) Corp.

D. Md.April 25, 2002No. Civ.A. WMN-99-383
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Nickerson
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Fourth Circuit reversed the district court's summary judgment for the defendant, finding a WARN Act violation. The case was remanded to the district court to determine damages, with instructions to assess whether the defendant acted in good faith and whether liability should be reduced accordingly.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Wins Appeal in Plant Closure Notice Case** This case involved Quebecor Printing, a company that closed a facility without giving workers the required advance notice. The Graphic Communications International Union sued on behalf of affected employees, claiming the company violated the WARN Act, a federal law that requires large employers to provide 60 days' written notice before mass layoffs or plant closures. Initially, a lower court ruled in favor of Quebecor Printing. However, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed this decision, finding that the company did indeed violate the WARN Act by failing to provide proper notice to workers before the closure. The appeals court sent the case back to the lower court to determine what damages the company should pay to affected workers. The lower court was instructed to consider whether Quebecor acted in good faith when deciding the final amount. **What This Means for Workers:** This ruling reinforces that employers cannot simply shut down facilities without following federal notification requirements. When companies violate the WARN Act, workers may be entitled to compensation for wages and benefits they would have received during the required notice period. The decision shows that courts will hold employers accountable for protecting workers' rights during layoffs and closures.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.