Skip to main content

Martinez-Bautista v. D & S PRODUCE

E.D. Ark.August 25, 2006No. 4:04-CV-710 GTECited 2 times
Plaintiff WinD & S Produce LLC
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Eisele
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
710 Fair Labor Standards Act
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of ContractWage TheftWrongful Termination

Outcome

The court granted plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment against D & S Produce and Ester Doolittle for breach of contract and FLSA violations, finding them jointly liable for failure to pay guaranteed wages, transportation costs, visa expenses, and adverse effect wage rates to H-2A workers.

What This Ruling Means

# Martinez-Bautista v. D & S Produce **What Happened** Martinez-Bautista and other workers sued D & S Produce and its owner, Ester Doolittle, claiming the company failed to pay them properly. The workers alleged they weren't paid guaranteed wages, had to cover their own transportation and visa costs, and weren't paid the required minimum wage rates for temporary agricultural workers. **What the Court Decided** The court sided with the workers and ruled against D & S Produce and Doolittle. The judge found them legally responsible for breach of contract and violations of federal wage laws. The company had to be held accountable for not paying the guaranteed wages, transportation expenses, visa fees, and proper wage rates owed to these H-2A workers (temporary agricultural workers). **Why This Matters for Workers** This case reinforces that employers cannot legally shift costs like visa fees or transportation onto workers' paychecks. It also shows that employers must pay the wages they promise and comply with federal minimum wage requirements—even for temporary workers. The ruling protects vulnerable workers by holding companies accountable for wage violations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.