Skip to main content

Satterfield v. F.W. Webb, Inc.

D. Me.September 14, 2004No. 1:04-cv-00168Cited 10 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Singal
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss
State
Maine

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationWage Theft

Outcome

The federal court granted plaintiff's motion to remand the case to state court, finding that the defendant failed to meet its burden of proving the amount in controversy exceeded $75,000 for federal diversity jurisdiction, despite the plaintiff's allegations of violations of the Maine Human Rights Act and overtime wage requirements.

What This Ruling Means

**Satterfield v. F.W. Webb, Inc.: Discrimination Case Gets Second Chance** **What Happened** An employee named Satterfield filed a discrimination lawsuit against their employer, F.W. Webb, Inc., a company in the plumbing and heating supply business. The case involved claims that the employee faced discrimination in the workplace, though the specific details of the discriminatory conduct are not provided in the available information. **What the Court Decided** The First Circuit Court of Appeals did not make a final ruling on whether discrimination actually occurred. Instead, the court sent the case back to a lower court for "further proceedings." This means the appellate court found issues with how the case was initially handled and determined it needed to be reviewed again with additional consideration. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows that courts take discrimination claims seriously and will ensure cases receive proper review. When an appeals court remands a case, it often means workers get another opportunity to present their claims or that important legal issues need to be addressed more thoroughly. For employees facing workplace discrimination, this demonstrates that even if an initial court decision doesn't go their way, the appeals process can provide another chance for justice.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.