Skip to main content

Friemuth v. Fiskars Brands, Inc.

W.D. Wis.February 3, 2010No. 09-cv-494-visCited 7 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Barbara B. Crabb
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Court granted plaintiff's motion to dismiss three of defendant's counterclaims (breach of contract, conspiracy, and fraud) while denying plaintiff's motion to amend complaint to add retaliation claim. Defendant given until February 25, 2010 to file amended counterclaims.

What This Ruling Means

**Friemuth v. Fiskars Brands: Age Discrimination Case** This case involved an age discrimination lawsuit filed by an employee named Friemuth against Fiskars Brands, Inc., a company that makes tools and other products. Friemuth claimed the company discriminated against him because of his age, which violates federal employment laws that protect older workers. The court made a mixed decision in February 2010. On one hand, the judge threw out three counterarguments that Fiskars had made against Friemuth, including claims that he breached his contract, engaged in conspiracy, and committed fraud. However, the court refused to let Friemuth add a new claim of retaliation to his original lawsuit. The company was given until February 25, 2010, to file revised counterarguments if they chose to do so. This case matters for workers because it shows that companies cannot simply make broad accusations against employees who file age discrimination complaints. Courts will dismiss weak counterarguments that appear to be attempts to intimidate workers. However, it also demonstrates that employees must be careful about the timing and scope of their discrimination claims, as courts may not always allow changes to lawsuits once they've begun.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.