Skip to main content

Skees v. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission

Ky. Ct. App.August 12, 2011No. 2010-CA-000389-MR
Plaintiff WinAmerica's Directories$1,833 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Stumbo, Thompson, Shake
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The appellate court reversed the lower court's decision and the unemployment insurance commission's denial of benefits, finding that the employer's abrupt relocation request 260 miles away for an indefinite period was unreasonable and thus did not constitute misconduct justifying termination.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Jennifer Skees worked for America's Directories when her employer suddenly told her she had to relocate 260 miles away for an indefinite period. When Skees refused to move, the company fired her. She then applied for unemployment benefits, but the Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission denied her claim, saying she was fired for misconduct because she refused to follow her employer's instructions. **What the Court Decided** The appellate court sided with Skees and overturned both the lower court's decision and the unemployment commission's denial. The court ruled that requiring an employee to suddenly relocate 260 miles away for an unclear length of time was unreasonable. Because the relocation demand was unreasonable, Skees' refusal to comply did not count as misconduct that would justify firing her or denying unemployment benefits. She was awarded $1,833 in damages. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling protects workers from unreasonable demands by employers. It establishes that employees cannot be denied unemployment benefits simply for refusing to accept drastic changes to their working conditions, like sudden long-distance relocations, especially when those changes are unreasonable or disruptive to their lives.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.