Skip to main content

Hall v. Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Ass'n Local Union 143

S.D. Ill.September 13, 2001No. 4:99-cv-04044Cited 1 time
RemandedOperative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association Local Union 143
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Gilbert
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
442 Civil rights jobs
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliation

Outcome

The district court denied defendant's motion for judgment on the pleadings and partial summary judgment, finding plaintiff stated viable Title VII and § 1981 claims for race discrimination and retaliation. The court allowed defendant to amend its answer to raise the failure to exhaust administrative remedies defense, which requires further adjudication on the merits.

What This Ruling Means

**Hall v. Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Ass'n Local Union 143** This case involved a dispute between a worker named Hall and Local Union 143 of the Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association. Based on the available information, this appears to be an employment-related legal matter filed in the Illinois Southern District Court in September 2001. Unfortunately, the court's final decision and specific details about what exactly happened between Hall and the union are not available in the provided information. The case was classified as an employment law matter, suggesting it likely involved workplace rights, union membership issues, or labor-related conflicts. **What This Means for Workers:** While we cannot determine the specific outcome of this case, it demonstrates that workers have legal options when disputes arise with unions. Workers can file lawsuits in federal court when they believe their employment rights have been violated, whether by employers or labor organizations. This case serves as a reminder that both union members and non-members have legal protections, and the court system is available to resolve workplace disputes when other methods fail. Workers facing similar union-related issues should know they have legal recourse available to them.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Discrimination casesRetaliation cases

Similar Rulings

Con Ed v. NLRB
U.S. Supreme CourtDec 1938
Mixed Result
Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtFeb 1951
Remanded
Vega
2nd CircuitSep 2015
Remanded
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
Phelps Dodge Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
U.S. Supreme CourtApr 1941
Plaintiff Win
Read Full OpinionMore Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Association Local Union 143 RulingsAll Rulings

Browse Related

More rulings from IllinoisMore discrimination casesMore construction employer cases

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

Check My RightsLearn the Basics

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.