Skip to main content

Laborer's District Council Pension Fund for Baltimore & Vicinity v. Regan

D.N.H.February 20, 2007No. 1:05-cr-00144Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McAULIFFE
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Court denied the Fund's motion for summary judgment, finding a genuine issue of material fact regarding whether Regan reasonably relied on the overpayments. The case was remanded for trial to determine whether equitable principles would bar recovery under ERISA.

What This Ruling Means

# What Happened The Laborers' District Council Pension Fund for Baltimore & Vicinity sued Regan over pension overpayments. The Fund claimed Regan received more money than he was entitled to receive and wanted the money back. Regan apparently argued he shouldn't have to repay the money because he reasonably believed the Fund meant to give it to him. # What the Court Decided The court rejected the Fund's request for a quick decision in their favor. Instead, the judge found there was a real factual disagreement about whether Regan had a reasonable basis to think the overpayments were intentional. The case will go to trial where a judge or jury will hear evidence and decide whether fairness principles should prevent the Fund from recovering the money. # Why This Matters for Workers This ruling protects workers' rights by ensuring pension disputes aren't resolved without a full hearing. It suggests courts will consider whether someone reasonably relied on pension payments before forcing repayment. Workers facing pension overpayment claims deserve their day in court to explain their situation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.