Skip to main content

Werth v. Employment Dept.

Or. Ct. App.September 29, 2010No. 09AB0423 A141601Cited 2 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Schuman, Presiding Judge, and Wollheim, Judge, and Rosenblum, Judge
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

HarassmentHostile Work EnvironmentConstructive Discharge

Outcome

The Court of Appeals reversed the Employment Appeals Board's denial of unemployment insurance benefits to an employee who quit her job after being stalked by a coworker, finding her belief that further stalking would occur was reasonable and that she had pursued reasonable alternatives under Oregon's stalking victim statute.

What This Ruling Means

# Werth v. Employment Department – What Workers Should Know ## What Happened An employee at Tillamook County Creamery Association quit her job after being stalked by a coworker. She then applied for unemployment benefits, but the Employment Appeals Board denied her claim, suggesting she should have stayed employed. ## What the Court Decided The Oregon Court of Appeals sided with the employee and reversed the earlier decision. The court found that her fear of continued stalking was reasonable and that she had tried other solutions before quitting. Because of this, she qualified for unemployment benefits. ## Why This Matters for Workers This ruling protects employees who face serious safety threats at work. It shows that quitting due to stalking or harassment can be a legitimate reason to receive unemployment insurance—you don't have to choose between your safety and financial security. The decision recognizes that when workplace dangers are real and an employee has explored alternatives, leaving the job is a reasonable choice deserving of unemployment support.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.