Skip to main content

Cheek v. EMPLOYMENT SEC. DEPT. OF WASHINGTON

Wash. Ct. App.June 21, 2001No. 19602-0-IIICited 9 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Schultheis
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The trial court properly dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the plaintiff failed to timely serve the Employment Security Department with her petition for review, as required by the Administrative Procedure Act. The court affirmed the dismissal and denied the plaintiff's request for attorney fees.

What This Ruling Means

I don't have enough information about the specific details of the Cheek v. Employment Security Department of Washington case to provide an accurate summary. The excerpt provided is empty, and while I can see this was an employment law case filed in Washington state court in 2001, I cannot determine what the actual dispute was about, what the court decided, or what the outcome means for workers. To give you a proper summary that would be helpful and accurate, I would need: - Details about what Mr. Cheek's complaint was against the Employment Security Department - What specific employment law issues were involved - How the court ruled on those issues - The reasoning behind the court's decision If you can provide the actual text of the court ruling or more details about the case, I'd be happy to explain it in plain English and help you understand what it means for workers. Providing an accurate summary without these key details wouldn't be responsible or helpful.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.