Skip to main content

Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Dolenc

Wyo.April 2, 2004No. 03-75Cited 27 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Hill, Golden, Lehman, Kite, Voigt
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Wyoming Supreme Court reversed the district court's summary judgment in favor of Dolenc, holding that the anti-indemnity statute did not apply to work on a water plant used for secondary oil recovery because it was not directly connected to an oil or gas well itself.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Dolenc: Wyoming Supreme Court Ruling** This case involved a dispute over who should pay for damages related to work at a water treatment plant used in oil production. Dolenc, likely a contractor or worker, was sued by Union Pacific Resources Company, which wanted Dolenc to cover costs under an indemnification agreement (a contract requiring one party to pay for the other's losses). Dolenc argued that Wyoming's anti-indemnity law protected him from having to pay these costs. This law prevents oil and gas companies from forcing contractors and workers to cover the company's damages and liabilities in certain situations. The Wyoming Supreme Court ruled in favor of Dolenc, but on narrow grounds. The court found that the anti-indemnity law didn't apply in this specific case because the work involved a water plant used for oil recovery, not work directly connected to an oil or gas well itself. **What this means for workers:** While Dolenc won this particular case, the ruling actually limits the protection of Wyoming's anti-indemnity law. The court interpreted the law narrowly, meaning workers and contractors may have less protection from indemnification agreements when their work involves oil industry facilities that aren't directly connected to wells.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.