Skip to main content

Union Pacific Railroad v. Trona Valley Federal Credit Union

Wyo.November 4, 2002No. 01-263Cited 11 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Golden, Hill, Kite, Lehman, Voigt
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Wyoming Supreme Court reversed the district court's judgment, holding that Union Pacific properly omitted child support garnishment when calculating disposable earnings for a consumer debt garnishment, as including it would violate the Consumer Protection Act's 25% maximum garnishment limit.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Pacific Railroad v. Trona Valley Federal Credit Union: Wage Garnishment Limits Protected** This case involved a dispute over how much money could be taken from a Union Pacific Railroad employee's paycheck to pay off debts. The employee already had child support payments being deducted from their wages. When a credit union tried to garnish additional money for a consumer debt, Union Pacific refused to take out the full amount the credit union wanted. The Wyoming Supreme Court sided with Union Pacific Railroad. The court ruled that the railroad was correct to limit the total garnishments to 25% of the employee's disposable earnings, as required by federal consumer protection law. Since child support was already being deducted, adding the full consumer debt garnishment would have exceeded this legal limit. **What this means for workers:** Federal law protects you from having too much of your paycheck garnished at once. Even if you owe money to multiple creditors, employers cannot take more than 25% of your disposable earnings for consumer debts combined. Child support and other priority obligations count toward this limit, providing important financial protection so you can still afford basic living expenses.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.