Skip to main content

Lineberry v. THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR INDUSTRIES

Wash.April 29, 2009No. 82670-6
Defendant WinThe Boeing Company
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Washington Supreme Court denied the petitioner's petition for review and awarded the defendant Boeing reasonable attorney fees and expenses.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker's Compensation Dispute Goes to Boeing** This case involved a worker named Lineberry who had a dispute with the Washington Department of Labor and Industries, likely related to workers' compensation benefits. The case also involved Boeing as the employer. Lineberry appealed the case all the way to the Washington Supreme Court, seeking to have a lower court's decision reviewed. **Court's Decision** The Washington Supreme Court refused to hear Lineberry's case, meaning they denied his petition for review. This left the lower court's ruling in favor of the Department of Labor and Industries standing. Additionally, the court ordered Lineberry to pay Boeing's attorney fees and court costs, which can be substantial. **What This Means for Workers** This case shows that workers who lose employment-related disputes may face significant financial consequences beyond just losing their case. When courts award attorney fees to the winning side, it can create a heavy financial burden for workers who were already struggling with workplace issues. Workers should carefully consider the potential costs before pursuing appeals to higher courts, and may want to seek legal counsel to understand their chances of success and potential financial exposure.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.