Skip to main content

Centennial School District No. 28J v. Oregon Bureau of Labor & Industries

Or. Ct. App.August 30, 2000No. 09-99; CA A106193Cited 9 times
Plaintiff WinCentennial School District No. 28J$25,000 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
De Muniz, Haselton, Wollheim
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to AccommodateWrongful TerminationRetaliation

Outcome

The Oregon Court of Appeals affirmed the Commissioner's determination that Centennial School District violated the Oregon Family Leave Act by denying the employee sufficient leave for a serious health condition (depression) and terminating his employment. The court upheld a $25,000 damages award for mental suffering.

What This Ruling Means

This case involved a Centennial School District employee who suffered from depression and needed time off work for this serious health condition. The employee requested leave under Oregon's Family Leave Act, but the school district denied adequate leave time and ultimately fired him. The employee filed a complaint with the Oregon Bureau of Labor & Industries, claiming the district failed to accommodate his medical needs, wrongfully terminated him, and retaliated against him for requesting leave. The Oregon Court of Appeals sided with the employee. The court confirmed that the school district violated Oregon's Family Leave Act by refusing to provide sufficient leave for the worker's depression and by terminating his employment. The court upheld a $25,000 award for the mental suffering the employee experienced due to the district's actions. This ruling is important for workers because it establishes that mental health conditions like depression qualify as serious health conditions under family leave laws. Employers cannot simply dismiss requests for leave related to mental health issues or fire workers for needing such time off. Workers facing similar situations have legal protections and may be entitled to compensation if their employers violate these rights.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.