Skip to main content

Roberts v. State of Montana Board of Labor Appeals

MONTNovember 5, 2013No. DA 13-0181
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
McKinnon, Wheat, Cotter, Baker, Rice
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Montana Supreme Court affirmed the Board of Labor Appeals' determination that the plaintiff was discharged for misconduct and is ineligible for unemployment benefits. The court found substantial evidence supported the findings that plaintiff violated school district financial policy by maintaining a separate FFA account and misappropriating funds.

What This Ruling Means

**Roberts v. State of Montana Board of Labor Appeals** This case involved a school employee who was fired from Lame Deer Public School District and then applied for unemployment benefits. The employee had maintained a separate account for the school's Future Farmers of America (FFA) program and was accused of misusing those funds, which violated the school district's financial policies. The employee challenged the denial of unemployment benefits, arguing the firing was unfair. However, the Montana Supreme Court sided with the state's Board of Labor Appeals, which had originally denied the benefits. The court found there was strong evidence that the employee had indeed violated school financial policies by keeping a separate FFA account and mishandling the money in it. **What this means for workers:** This ruling reinforces that employees fired for misconduct cannot collect unemployment benefits. Workers should be especially careful to follow their employer's financial policies and procedures exactly as written. Even if an employee believes they were trying to help their organization (like managing program funds), straying from official policies can be considered misconduct serious enough to disqualify them from unemployment compensation. Always get written approval before handling company money in ways that might violate established procedures.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.