Skip to main content

Sander v. State Bar of Cal.

Cal. SupremeDecember 19, 2013No. S194951Cited 21 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
58 Cal. 4th 300, 314 P.3d 488, 165 Cal. Rptr. 3d 250, 2013 WL 6670717, 2013 Cal. LEXIS 10183
Judge(s)
Cantil-Sakauye
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The California Supreme Court reversed the trial court's dismissal and remanded the case, holding that plaintiffs have a common law right of access to the State Bar's admissions database if privacy concerns can be adequately addressed, but the trial court must now determine whether and how the database can be redacted and whether countervailing interests support nondisclosure.

What This Ruling Means

**Sander v. State Bar of California: Court Rules on Access to Bar Admissions Data** This case involved a dispute over whether the public could access the State Bar of California's database containing information about lawyer admissions. The plaintiffs wanted to examine this data, likely for research purposes, but the State Bar refused to provide it, citing privacy and other concerns. The California Supreme Court sided with the plaintiffs, ruling that people have a legal right to access the State Bar's admissions database under common law. However, the court didn't simply order the database to be handed over. Instead, it sent the case back to the lower court with specific instructions: the trial court must figure out how to protect people's privacy by removing sensitive information from the database before releasing it. The court also said the trial judge should consider whether there are other important reasons to keep some information private. **Why this matters for workers:** This ruling reinforces the principle that government agencies and quasi-governmental organizations must be transparent with public information. For workers, this could set a precedent for accessing employment-related data from professional licensing boards and similar organizations, though privacy protections will still apply.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.