Skip to main content

Clementine Newman v. Karla Davis, Commissioner of Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development, and Memphis Light, Gas, and Water

Tenn. Ct. App.February 7, 2014No. W2013-00696-COA-R3-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge J. Steven Stafford
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed the Commissioner's decision that the employee was not qualified for unemployment benefits, finding substantial evidence supporting the denial based on the employee's failure to return to work and satisfy eligibility requirements under Tennessee law.

What This Ruling Means

**Newman v. Davis - Tennessee Employment Dispute** This case involved Clementine Newman, who filed a dispute against the Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development and Memphis Light, Gas, and Water (a public utility company). Newman brought her case to the Tennessee Court of Appeals in February 2014, suggesting she had already lost at a lower court level. Based on the limited information available, this appears to be an employment-related dispute where Newman was challenging some action or decision involving both her employer (Memphis Light, Gas, and Water) and the state labor department. The involvement of both the employer and the state agency suggests this may have concerned workplace regulations, benefits, or employment rights that fall under state oversight. Unfortunately, the court's final decision and reasoning are not available in the provided case details, making it impossible to determine how the case was resolved. **What this means for workers:** Even without knowing the outcome, this case shows that employees can challenge both their employers and state agencies when they believe their employment rights have been violated. Workers have the right to appeal unfavorable decisions through the court system, though success depends on the specific facts and applicable laws in each situation.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.