Skip to main content

Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers & Participating Employers v. Ray Haluch Gravel Co.

1st CircuitMarch 11, 2014No. 11-1944, 11-1970Cited 59 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Thompson, Selya, Dyk
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Appeal to First Circuit Court of Appeals; partial affirmance and partial reversal of lower court decision

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

First Circuit affirmed in part and reversed in part regarding whether the employer's contributions to a multiemployer pension plan were untimely and whether penalties and attorneys' fees were properly imposed.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Ray Haluch Gravel Company was required to make regular pension contributions for its workers who belonged to the International Union of Operating Engineers. The pension fund claimed the company was late with these payments and demanded additional penalties and legal fees on top of the missing contributions. The company disagreed, arguing their payments were made on time and that the extra charges were unfair. **What the Court Decided** The First Circuit Court of Appeals issued a mixed ruling. The court agreed with some of the pension fund's claims about late payments but disagreed with others. The court also partially overturned the lower court's decision about whether penalties and attorney's fees should be imposed on the company. Some of the fund's demands were upheld while others were rejected. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights the importance of employer pension contributions being made on time. When companies are late with pension payments, it can affect workers' retirement security. The ruling reinforces that employers have strict obligations to make timely pension contributions, though it also shows that penalty claims must be carefully evaluated. Workers should monitor whether their employers are meeting pension contribution deadlines.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.