Skip to main content

Shyanguya v. Employment Security Appeals Referees' Office

Haw.June 6, 2014No. SCWC-13-0001659
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Hawaii

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The Hawaii Supreme Court rejected the petitioner's amended application for writ of certiorari, affirming the lower court's decision. The employee's appeal regarding an employment security decision against The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co., LLC was unsuccessful.

What This Ruling Means

Based on the limited information available, this case involved a dispute between someone named Shyanguya and Hawaii's Employment Security Appeals Referees' Office. This office handles appeals related to unemployment benefits and other employment security matters in Hawaii. Unfortunately, the specific details about what Shyanguya was disputing are not provided in the available case information. The Employment Security Appeals Referees' Office typically deals with cases where workers appeal decisions about their unemployment benefits, such as denials of claims or disputes over benefit amounts. The court's decision in this case is not known from the available information, making it difficult to determine how the dispute was resolved or what legal principles were applied. Without knowing the specific issues raised or the court's ruling, it's challenging to draw clear lessons for workers. However, this case serves as a reminder that workers have the right to appeal decisions made by employment security offices. If workers disagree with unemployment benefit decisions or other employment security determinations, they can seek review through Hawaii's appeals process and potentially through the courts if necessary. Workers should keep detailed records of any employment security disputes and consider seeking guidance when navigating the appeals process.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.