Skip to main content

James Reynolds v. Daniel M. Tangherlini

7th CircuitDecember 12, 2013No. 12-1010Cited 122 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Citation
737 F.3d 1093, 87 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 713, 2013 WL 6501331, 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 24736, 121 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 338
Judge(s)
Flaum, Sykes, Tinder
Nature of Suit — the legal category of the dispute
civil
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Appeal from district court decision after bench trial

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no evidence to support Reynolds' age discrimination claim.

What This Ruling Means

**Reynolds v. Tangherlini: Court Dismisses Employee's Claims** James Reynolds, a federal employee, brought employment-related claims against his supervisor, Daniel M. Tangherlini. While the court record doesn't specify the exact nature of Reynolds' complaints, the case involved workplace issues that Reynolds believed violated employment laws. The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Reynolds' case in December 2013, meaning the court ruled against him and his claims were thrown out. The court found that Reynolds had not proven his case or that there were legal reasons preventing his lawsuit from moving forward. No damages were awarded to Reynolds. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the challenges employees face when bringing employment law claims to court. Simply having workplace problems doesn't guarantee a successful lawsuit - workers must be able to prove their claims meet specific legal standards. The dismissal shows that courts require solid evidence and proper legal grounds to rule in favor of employees. For workers considering legal action against employers or supervisors, this case demonstrates the importance of documenting workplace issues thoroughly and understanding that not all employment disputes will result in court victories, even when employees feel they've been wronged.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.