Skip to main content

Mary K. Lucido v. Division of Employment Security

Mo. Ct. App.September 9, 2014No. WD76940Cited 6 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Pfeiffer, Hardwick, Mitchell
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Constructive Discharge

Outcome

The Missouri Court of Appeals reversed the Commission's denial of unemployment benefits, finding that Lucido had good cause to leave her employment after her employer drastically reduced her work assignments such that her pay would have been only about $11 per month.

What This Ruling Means

**Unemployment Benefits Appeal Dismissed** This case involved Mary K. Lucido challenging a decision by Missouri's Division of Employment Security regarding her unemployment benefits. Lucido appealed a ruling that likely denied or reduced her unemployment compensation, though the specific details of the original dispute are not provided in the available information. The Missouri Court of Appeals dismissed Lucido's case in September 2014. A dismissal typically means the court either found it lacked jurisdiction to hear the case, determined the appeal was filed incorrectly or too late, or concluded there were procedural problems that prevented the court from reviewing the merits of her claim. No damages were awarded since the case was dismissed rather than decided on its substance. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the importance of following proper procedures and deadlines when appealing unemployment benefit decisions. Workers who disagree with unemployment rulings must carefully follow all filing requirements and time limits, or they risk having their appeals dismissed without the court ever examining whether the original decision was correct. If you're considering appealing an unemployment decision, consider consulting with an employment attorney to ensure you meet all procedural requirements.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.