Skip to main content

Keith G. Lassiter, Relator v. The Bulldog Restaurant NE, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development

Minn. Ct. App.January 5, 2015No. A14-1168
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed the unemployment law judge's determination that the employee was discharged for employment misconduct (violating the employer's policy against touching customers), making him ineligible for unemployment benefits.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Keith Lassiter worked at The Bulldog Restaurant and applied for unemployment benefits after leaving his job. The Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development made a decision about whether he qualified for these benefits. Either Lassiter or the restaurant disagreed with this decision and appealed it to the court. **What the Court Decided** The court records don't show the final outcome of this appeal. This was an appellate case, meaning a higher court was reviewing the unemployment department's original decision about Lassiter's benefit eligibility. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case illustrates an important right that workers have: if you disagree with a decision about your unemployment benefits, you can appeal it through the courts. When you lose your job, the state unemployment office decides whether you qualify for benefits based on factors like how you left your job (were you fired for misconduct, did you quit, were you laid off). If you think their decision is wrong, you don't have to accept it. You can challenge the ruling and take your case to court, just like Lassiter did here.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.