Skip to main content

Terada v. Eli Lilly and Company

Ill. App. Ct.May 12, 2015No. 5-14-0170Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
Circuit
5th Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationWhistleblowerWrongful Termination

Outcome

The appellate court reversed the circuit court's decision transferring venue from St. Clair County to Jackson County, finding that venue was proper under Illinois law because the plaintiff worked in St. Clair County and remanded for further proceedings on the merits of her discrimination, retaliation, and whistleblowing claims.

What This Ruling Means

# Terada v. Eli Lilly and Company Summary **What Happened** An employee named Terada filed an employment law dispute against pharmaceutical company Eli Lilly and Company. While the specific details of the complaint aren't included in the court record, the case involved disagreements about workplace rights or conditions. **The Court's Decision** The Illinois Appeals Court dismissed the case in May 2015. This means the court found that the case should not proceed further, and no damages (monetary compensation) were awarded to Terada. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling shows that not all employment disputes result in successful court outcomes. When a case is dismissed, it typically means the court found problems with how the claim was presented or that the law didn't support the employee's position. For workers considering legal action against employers, this case demonstrates the importance of properly preparing claims and understanding which employment laws actually protect your specific situation. Workers facing workplace issues should consult with an employment attorney early to ensure their claims have legal merit before proceeding to court.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Terada from the same court.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.