Skip to main content

Jeff Kirby, Apps. v. State Of Wa/dept. Of Employment Security, Resp.

Wash. Ct. App.May 26, 2015No. 71708-1
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The court affirmed the Commissioner's decision awarding unemployment benefits to the employee Robert Boiling, finding no disqualifying misconduct despite the employer's assertion of insubordination as grounds for termination.

What This Ruling Means

**Jeff Kirby v. State of Washington Department of Employment Security - Court Case Summary** **What Happened:** Jeff Kirby filed an appeal against the Washington State Department of Employment Security. While the specific details of the dispute aren't provided in the available court records, this type of case typically involves disagreements over unemployment benefits, such as denials of claims, benefit amounts, or eligibility determinations. **What the Court Decided:** The outcome of this appeal case is not specified in the available court documents. The case was filed in May 2015 in Washington's Court of Appeals, but the final decision and any damages awarded are not reported in the publicly available information. **Why This Matters for Workers:** Even without knowing the specific outcome, this case represents an important right that workers have when dealing with state employment agencies. Workers can appeal decisions made by the Department of Employment Security through the court system if they believe they've been wrongly denied benefits or treated unfairly. This appeals process provides a legal pathway for workers to challenge government decisions that affect their unemployment compensation and employment rights. *Note: This summary is based on limited available information about the case.*

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.