Skip to main content

Equal Emp't Opportunity Comm'n v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.

U.S. Supreme CourtJune 1, 2015No. 14–86.Cited 282 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Scaliadelivered, Thomas
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
Supreme Court affirmed decision requiring religious accommodation; matter remanded for determination of undue hardship
Circuit
Federal Circuit

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Supreme Court held that Title VII requires employers to provide reasonable religious accommodations to employees unless doing so causes undue hardship, even if accommodation imposes some increased costs on the employer.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** A Muslim woman applied for a job at Abercrombie & Fitch while wearing a headscarf as part of her religious practice. The company didn't hire her, assuming her headscarf would violate their strict dress code policy that required employees to maintain a specific "look." The woman never explicitly asked for a religious accommodation during her interview, but the company suspected she wore the headscarf for religious reasons. **What the Court Decided** The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the job applicant. The Court said that employers cannot refuse to hire someone because they might need a religious accommodation in the future. Companies don't have to wait for employees to specifically request religious accommodations—if an employer suspects someone's religious practice might conflict with workplace policies, they must try to find reasonable ways to accommodate that practice unless it would cause significant hardship. **Why This Matters for Workers** This decision strengthens religious protections in the workplace. Workers don't have to explicitly mention their religious needs during job interviews to be protected from discrimination. Employers must be proactive about accommodating religious practices like head coverings, prayer breaks, or religious holidays, making workplaces more inclusive for people of all faiths.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.