Skip to main content

McCoy v. Perris Union H.S. Dist. CA4/1

Cal. Ct. App.June 8, 2015No. D067421
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
summary judgment

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationFailure to Accommodate

Outcome

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Perris Union High School District and former principal Penelope Graham on all claims. The appellate court affirmed, finding the District was entitled to summary judgment because McCoy was not entitled to FMLA leave for the requested purposes and received negative evaluations based on poor performance rather than retaliatory or discriminatory motives.

What This Ruling Means

**McCoy v. Perris Union High School District - Employment Dispute** **What Happened:** An employee named McCoy had a workplace dispute with the Perris Union High School District in California. The case involved employment law issues, though the specific details of the disagreement are not available from the court records provided. **What the Court Decided:** Unfortunately, the outcome of this case cannot be determined from the available information. The case was filed in California's appellate court in June 2015, but the final decision and any reasoning behind it are not included in the accessible court records. **Why This Matters for Workers:** Without knowing the specific outcome, it's difficult to draw concrete lessons from this case. However, the fact that this employment dispute reached the appellate court level shows that workplace disagreements can escalate significantly through the legal system. This demonstrates the importance for workers to understand their employment rights and seek proper legal guidance when facing workplace issues. Workers should also be aware that employment law cases can be complex and lengthy processes that may take years to resolve through the courts. *Note: This summary is based on limited available information about the case.*

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.