Skip to main content

Matter of Cardillo (Commr. of Labor)

N.Y. App. Div.June 25, 2015No. 519954Cited 1 time
Defendant Win
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Garry, Rose, Devine, Clark
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Appellate Division affirmed the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board's decision disqualifying claimant from receiving unemployment benefits under Labor Law § 593(4) because he lost his employment as a result of committing a felony (securities fraud) connected to his employment, and it upheld the recoverable overpayment.

What This Ruling Means

# Cardillo v. Commissioner of Labor Summary **What Happened** A worker filed a dispute with New York's labor department against their employer, Cardillo. The case involved an employment law disagreement that required the Commissioner of Labor to review and decide. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed the case. This means the judge determined that the claim should not proceed further in the legal system. No damages were awarded to the worker. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case reminds workers that employment disputes don't always succeed, even when filed formally. When cases are dismissed, it typically means the court found legal or procedural reasons to reject the claim—not necessarily that the employer was right about the facts. Workers facing similar situations should understand that winning an employment case requires meeting specific legal requirements. It's important to document workplace problems carefully and seek guidance early, as dismissals can affect workers' ability to recover compensation for workplace issues.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.