Skip to main content

Food Employers Labor Relations Ass'n v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

2nd CircuitJuly 2, 2015No. 14-3349-bk
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Ann, Calabresi, Debra, Guido, Livingston, Sessions III, William
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Second Circuit affirmed the bankruptcy court's denial of FELRA's motion for administrative expense treatment of its withdrawal liability claim against A&P's bankruptcy estate, finding FELRA failed to meet its burden of proof that the claim was entitled to administrative expense status.

What This Ruling Means

**Court Ruling Summary: Food Employers Labor Relations Ass'n v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.** This case involved a dispute over pension fund obligations when the grocery chain A&P went bankrupt. The Food Employers Labor Relations Association (FELRA) - a group that manages pension benefits for union workers - claimed that A&P owed money for withdrawing from the pension plan. FELRA wanted this debt to be treated as a high-priority "administrative expense" in the bankruptcy proceedings, which would have meant getting paid before other creditors. The court ruled against FELRA. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court's decision that FELRA failed to prove their pension withdrawal claim deserved special priority status in the bankruptcy. This meant FELRA would have to get in line with other regular creditors, likely receiving much less money or nothing at all. **Why this matters for workers:** When employers go bankrupt, this ruling shows that pension obligations may not receive priority treatment in court. Union workers whose employers contribute to multi-employer pension plans could face reduced benefits if their company goes bankrupt and owes withdrawal penalties. Workers should understand that bankruptcy can significantly impact their retirement security, even with union-negotiated pension plans.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.