Skip to main content

Travis Hern, Relator v. Massage Retreat & Spa, Department of Employment and Economic Development

Minn. Ct. App.August 17, 2015No. A14-2066
Defendant WinMassage Retreat & Spa$4,177 at issue
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The court affirmed the unemployment law judge's decision that the employee fraudulently underreported his earnings to DEED and must repay overpaid benefits, rejecting his argument that he reasonably relied on a customer service representative's allegedly incorrect advice.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Travis Hern worked at Massage Retreat & Spa and received unemployment benefits from Minnesota's Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED). The state discovered that Hern had underreported his earnings while collecting unemployment benefits, meaning he received more money than he was entitled to. Hern claimed he made an honest mistake because a DEED customer service representative gave him incorrect advice about how to report his earnings. **The Court's Decision** The court sided with the state and ruled that Hern had to repay $4,177 in overpaid unemployment benefits. The court rejected Hern's defense that he relied on bad advice from a DEED employee. The judge determined that Hern fraudulently underreported his income, regardless of what the customer service representative may have told him. **What This Means for Workers** This case shows that workers are ultimately responsible for accurately reporting their earnings when collecting unemployment benefits, even if they receive conflicting information from government employees. Workers cannot use incorrect advice from unemployment office staff as a defense against fraud charges. It's crucial to carefully track and honestly report all income to avoid having to repay benefits and face potential fraud penalties.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.