Skip to main content

Nancy Broadhurst v. Employees Retirement System of Texas

Tex. App.—3rd Dist.July 26, 2002No. 03-01-00652-CV
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to Accommodate

Outcome

The court affirmed the Board's denial of occupational disability retirement benefits, holding that the plaintiff's back injury from sitting in a chair did not arise from a risk or hazard both inherent in and peculiar to her CPS specialist duties.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened:** Nancy Broadhurst worked as a Child Protective Services (CPS) specialist for the Texas retirement system. She injured her back while sitting in a chair at work and applied for occupational disability retirement benefits. These special benefits are available to workers whose injuries happen because of unique risks that come with their specific job duties. **What the Court Decided:** The court ruled against Broadhurst and upheld the retirement board's decision to deny her benefits. The court determined that injuring your back from sitting in a chair is not a risk that is unique to being a CPS specialist. Since sitting in chairs is something workers in many different jobs do, the injury didn't qualify as an occupational disability under the retirement system's rules. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This case shows that getting occupational disability benefits requires proving your injury came from risks that are specifically related to your particular job, not just general workplace activities. Workers seeking these benefits need to demonstrate their injury resulted from hazards that are inherent to their specific role, not common activities like sitting, walking, or using standard office equipment that most workers encounter.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

More Rulings in This Case

Other orders and opinions in Nancy Broadhurst v. Employees Retirement System of Texas from the same court.

Similar Rulings

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
People in re S.L. and A.L
COLOCTAPPDec 2017

The Rio Blanco County Department of Human Services (Department) became involved with the parents in this case as a result of concerns about the children's welfare due to the condition of the family home, the parents' use of methamphetamine, and criminal cases involving the parents. Attempts at voluntary services failed, and on the Department's petition for dependency and neglect, the district court ultimately terminated the parents' rights. On appeal, the parents contended that the Department failed to make reasonable efforts to reunify them with their children. Specifically, the parents contended that the Department did not give them sufficient time to complete the services under their treatment plans and failed to accommodate their drug testing needs. The termination hearing was not held until more than a year after the motion to terminate was filed. For nine months before the motion to terminate was filed, the Department provided numerous services to the parents, including substance abuse therapy, therapeutic visitation supervision, drug abuse monitoring, and a parental capacity evaluation. The Department also provided counseling for the children. Both parents missed drug tests and tested positive during the testing period, and both were arrested for possession of methamphetamine during the pendency of the case. The Department made reasonable accommodations to meet the parents' needs and the parents had sufficient time to comply with their treatment plans. The record supports the trial court's findings that termination was appropriate because (1) the court-approved appropriate treatment plan had not been complied with by the parents or had not been successful in rehabilitating them (2) the parents were unfit and (3) the conduct or condition of the parents was unlikely to change within a reasonable time. Father also contended that the trial court's decision to interview the 9-year-old twin children together in chambers fundamentally and seriously affected the basi

Defendant Win
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Plaintiff Win
James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health Lab
9th CircuitNov 2000
Mixed Result
Wright
10th CircuitAug 2001
Defendant Win

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.