Skip to main content

Local 6-0682 International Union of Paper v. National Industrial Group Pension Plan

6th CircuitSeptember 11, 2003No. 01-2680Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Katz, Moore, Rogers
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the pension plan defendants, holding that ERISA does not provide a cause of action for negligence in providing erroneous benefit quotations offered as a courtesy, and rejecting the union's attempt to establish a federal common law negligence claim.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Loses Case Over Wrong Pension Information** This case involved a dispute between a union and a pension plan over incorrect benefit information. The union claimed that the National Industrial Group Pension Plan gave workers wrong estimates about their retirement benefits when they asked for quotes. The union argued this was a breach of contract and negligence, saying the pension plan should be held responsible for providing inaccurate information. The court ruled in favor of the pension plan. The judges found that federal law (ERISA) does not allow workers or unions to sue pension plans for simple mistakes when providing benefit estimates as a courtesy service. The court also rejected the union's attempt to create a new type of negligence claim under federal law for these situations. This decision matters because it shows that workers cannot easily sue their pension plans for giving them wrong benefit estimates, even if those mistakes cause problems with retirement planning. Workers should be aware that informal benefit quotes may contain errors and should verify important pension information through official channels. The ruling protects pension plans from lawsuits over informal estimates while placing more responsibility on workers to double-check their benefit information.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.