Skip to main content

Trustees of Painters Union Deposit Fund v. Ybarra Construction Co.

6th CircuitOctober 14, 2004No. 03-1680Cited 10 times
Plaintiff WinYbarra Construction Company$284,942.4 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Martin, Cole, Gibbons
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The district court granted summary judgment for the Painters Union Deposit Fund trustees, finding that Ybarra Construction owed $237,452.00 in delinquent fringe benefit contributions plus $47,490.40 in liquidated damages. The Sixth Circuit affirmed, holding that no genuine issue of material fact existed regarding the amount owed.

What This Ruling Means

**Union Wins Fight to Collect Unpaid Worker Benefits from Construction Company** This case involved a dispute over unpaid worker benefits between a painters union fund and Ybarra Construction Company. The union's trustees sued the construction company, claiming it failed to pay required contributions to the fund that provides benefits like health insurance and pensions to union workers. These contributions are typically required under collective bargaining agreements between unions and employers. The court ruled in favor of the union fund. Both the lower court and the appeals court found that Ybarra Construction owed $237,452 in overdue benefit contributions, plus an additional $47,490 in penalty damages, totaling nearly $285,000. The appeals court agreed there was no genuine dispute about the amount the company owed. This ruling matters for workers because it reinforces that employers must follow through on their commitments to pay into benefit funds. When companies skip these payments, workers can lose access to healthcare, retirement savings, and other crucial benefits they've earned. The case shows that courts will hold employers accountable and require them to pay both the missing contributions and additional penalties when they fail to meet these obligations.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.