Skip to main content

William J. Lang Land Clearing, Inc. v. Administrator, Wage & Hour Division

6th CircuitAugust 6, 2008No. 07-2423
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Rogers, McKeague, Adams
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wage Theft

Outcome

The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the Department of Labor, rejecting the employer's challenge to the Wage Appeals Board's prevailing wage determination on federally funded projects.

What This Ruling Means

**What happened:** William J. Lang Land Clearing, a construction company, was involved in a dispute with the Department of Labor over wage requirements for federally funded projects. When companies work on projects paid for by the federal government, they must follow special rules called "prevailing wage" laws. These laws require employers to pay workers the standard wages that are common in that area for similar work. Lang apparently disagreed with the Department of Labor's determination about what wages they were required to pay their workers on these federal projects. **What the court decided:** The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the Department of Labor. The court upheld the Wage Appeals Board's decision that Lang was required to follow the prevailing wage rules as determined by federal officials. The court agreed that the Department of Labor had correctly applied the wage requirements to Lang's federal construction projects. **Why this matters for workers:** This ruling reinforces that companies working on federally funded projects must pay the prevailing wages set by the government, which are typically higher than minimum wage. Workers on federal construction projects can expect their employers to follow these wage standards, and the Department of Labor has the authority to enforce these requirements when companies try to avoid paying proper wages.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse more:Wage Theft cases

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.