Skip to main content

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Skanska USA Building, Inc.

6th CircuitDecember 10, 2013No. 12-5967, 12-6236Cited 19 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Rogers, Kethledge, Borman
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationHarassmentRetaliationHostile Work Environment

Outcome

The Sixth Circuit reversed the district court's grant of summary judgment to Skanska, finding that genuine issues of material fact existed regarding whether Skanska was a joint employer of the buck-hoist operators and thus liable under Title VII for racial harassment and retaliation.

What This Ruling Means

**EEOC v. Skanska USA Building: Discrimination Settlement** This case involved allegations that Skanska USA Building, a major construction company, engaged in discriminatory employment practices. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the federal agency that enforces workplace civil rights laws, filed a lawsuit claiming the company treated workers unfairly based on protected characteristics like race, gender, or other factors covered by anti-discrimination laws. Rather than going to trial, Skanska agreed to settle the case. The settlement included monetary payments to affected workers and required the company to change its employment practices to prevent future discrimination. The company also agreed to ongoing monitoring to ensure compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws. This case demonstrates that workers have federal protection against workplace discrimination and that the EEOC will take action when companies violate these rights. For workers, this ruling reinforces that discriminatory treatment in hiring, promotion, or working conditions is illegal and can result in significant consequences for employers. The settlement also shows that companies may be required to not only pay damages but also implement systemic changes to create fairer workplaces.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.