Skip to main content

Davis v. International Union of Operating Engineers Local Union No. 965

7th CircuitJune 2, 2005No. 04-3979
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Bauer, Rovner, Evans
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Discrimination

Outcome

The district court's dismissal of Davis's race discrimination case was affirmed on statute of limitations grounds. Davis failed to file his suit within 90 days of the EEOC sending him his right-to-sue notice, rendering the case time-barred.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Davis, a worker, believed he faced race discrimination at his job with the International Union of Operating Engineers Local Union No. 965. He filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which is the federal agency that handles workplace discrimination claims. After the EEOC finished investigating, they sent Davis a "right-to-sue notice" - essentially permission to take his case to court. However, Davis waited too long to actually file his lawsuit in court. **What the Court Decided** The court dismissed Davis's case entirely. The judges ruled that Davis missed a critical deadline - he had only 90 days from when he received his right-to-sue notice to file his lawsuit, but he filed it too late. Because he missed this deadline, the court wouldn't even consider whether discrimination actually occurred. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case highlights a crucial timing rule for workers facing discrimination. After filing with the EEOC, you only have 90 days from receiving your right-to-sue notice to take your case to court. Missing this deadline means losing your chance to pursue your discrimination claim entirely, regardless of how strong your case might be. Workers should mark their calendars immediately upon receiving EEOC notices.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.