Skip to main content

In Re UAL Corporation (Pilots' Pension Plan Termination)

7th CircuitOctober 25, 2006No. 06-1867, 06-2843, 06-2662, 06-2714Cited 3 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Bauer, Posner, Easterbrook
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

Seventh Circuit addressed consolidated appeals concerning termination of United Airlines pilots' defined-benefit pension plan and supplemental retirement benefits. Court affirmed in part regarding the PBGC's termination date but ruled on supplemental benefits issues, dismissing PBGC's appeal as it had prevailed below.

What This Ruling Means

# United Airlines Pilots' Pension Case Summary ## What Happened United Airlines pilots faced the termination of their pension plan during the company's financial crisis. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), a federal agency that protects pensions when companies fail, appealed the decision about how to handle the plan's termination and disputed payments for supplemental pension benefits. ## What the Court Decided A federal appeals court upheld the lower court's decision to allow United Airlines to terminate the pilots' pension plan as of December 30, 2004. The court rejected the PBGC's argument that a different method should be used to calculate the termination. The ruling also addressed how supplemental pension payments would be handled. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case illustrates that even when companies face financial hardship, pension plans can be terminated. However, the PBGC exists to provide some protection—eligible retirees typically receive guaranteed benefits up to legal limits. The case reminds workers that pensions are vulnerable during corporate struggles and highlights the importance of understanding pension protections and exploring diversified retirement savings options.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.