Skip to main content

Jose Ramos v. Department of Labor & Industries

Wash. Ct. App.October 6, 2015No. 32675-6-IIICited 4 times
Defendant WinDouble S Orchards
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Brown, Siddoway, Lawrence-Berrey
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Court of Appeals affirmed the Department of Labor & Industries' wage orders calculating Ramos' workers' compensation time loss benefits at $48.64/month and assessing overpayments. Substantial evidence supported the trial court's findings, and Ramos' attorney fee request was denied.

What This Ruling Means

**Jose Ramos v. Department of Labor & Industries: What Workers Should Know** Jose Ramos filed a legal claim against Washington State's Department of Labor & Industries, though the specific details of his complaint are not provided in the available court records. This case went through the appeals process in Washington's court system. The appeals court decided to send the case back to a lower court for additional review and proceedings. This type of decision, called a "remand," typically means the appeals court found that more investigation or consideration was needed before a final decision could be made. The court did not make a final ruling on whether Ramos was right or wrong in his claim. This case matters for workers because it shows that employees can challenge decisions made by state labor agencies through the court system. When workers disagree with how a government labor department handles their case, they have the right to appeal those decisions. While this particular case didn't result in a final outcome, it demonstrates that the appeals process exists as a safeguard for workers who believe they haven't received fair treatment from state labor officials.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.