Skip to main content

United Mine Workers of America, International Union v. Eighty-Four Mining Co.

3rd CircuitNovember 21, 2005No. 04-2130Cited 1 time
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Sloyiter, Barry, Smith
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Third Circuit affirmed the District Court's dismissal of the employer's defense regarding calendar days calculation, but reversed in part regarding what items of remuneration constitute 'back pay' under the WARN Act, limiting recovery to regular rate compensation and regularly available overtime, excluding holiday pay, birthday pay, and vacation pay.

What This Ruling Means

# Court Ruling Summary: United Mine Workers of America v. Eighty-Four Mining Co. ## What Happened The United Mine Workers union sued Eighty-Four Mining Company over the company's failure to provide proper notice before laying off workers, as required by federal law. The dispute centered on how to calculate the payment owed to workers—specifically, what types of pay should be included when determining "back pay" compensation. ## What the Court Decided The appeals court sided partially with the union and partially with the company. The court ruled that when calculating what workers are owed, employers must include regular wages and overtime that workers normally earned. However, the court excluded holiday pay, birthday pay, and vacation pay from the required compensation. ## Why This Matters for Workers This case clarifies workers' rights when companies close without proper warning. While it establishes that workers deserve compensation for their regular earnings, it limits what additional payments they can recover. The ruling helps define exactly what "back pay" means under federal layoff notice requirements, though it reduces the total amount affected workers might receive compared to their full salary package.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.