Skip to main content

Advanced v. NLRB

8th CircuitApril 20, 2001No. 00-1069
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Outcome

The Eighth Circuit enforced the NLRB's order requiring Advanced Construction Services, Inc. to provide information to Local No. 444 regarding the relationship between ACS and Advanced Office Interiors, finding that the Local is an authorized bargaining representative under the collective bargaining agreements and the requested information was relevant to collective bargaining purposes.

What This Ruling Means

**Advanced Construction Services v. NLRB (2001)** This case involved a dispute between Advanced Construction Services, Inc. and a union called Local No. 444. The union requested information about the relationship between Advanced Construction Services and another company called Advanced Office Interiors. The union needed this information to properly represent workers during contract negotiations, but the company refused to provide it. The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) ordered the company to turn over the requested information. When Advanced Construction Services challenged this order in court, the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals sided with the NLRB and enforced the order. The court ruled that Local No. 444 was the legitimate bargaining representative for the workers under their collective bargaining agreements. More importantly, the court found that the information about the relationship between the two companies was relevant and necessary for the union to effectively negotiate on behalf of workers. **Why This Matters for Workers:** This ruling strengthens workers' rights by ensuring that unions can access important company information needed for contract negotiations. When employers try to hide relationships between related companies, it can hurt workers' bargaining power. This decision helps unions get the facts they need to negotiate fair contracts and protect workers' interests.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.