Skip to main content

Raleigh v. Alcon Laboratories

Ill. App. Ct.August 6, 2010No. 1-09-1790 Rel
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The appellate court affirmed summary judgment for both defendants. Plaintiff's claims for strict product liability and negligence against Alcon and medical negligence and res ipsa loquitur against West Suburban were all dismissed because plaintiff failed to establish that the intraocular lens was defective when it left Alcon's facility or that West Suburban deviated from the standard of care.

What This Ruling Means

**Raleigh v. Alcon Laboratories: Court Rules Against Employee in Product Defect Case** An employee named Raleigh sued both their medical device manufacturer employer, Alcon Laboratories, and West Suburban Medical Center after experiencing problems with an intraocular lens (a device implanted in the eye during surgery). Raleigh claimed the lens was defective when it left Alcon's manufacturing facility and that the medical center provided substandard care during the implantation procedure. The court ruled against Raleigh on all claims. The appellate court found that Raleigh failed to prove the lens was actually defective when it left Alcon's facility or that the medical center's doctors made any mistakes during the surgery. As a result, both the manufacturer and medical center were cleared of any wrongdoing, and Raleigh received no compensation. This case highlights an important challenge for workers who suffer injuries related to products made by their employers. Even if you work for a company and are injured by one of its products, you still must prove the product was actually defective and that the defect caused your injury. Simply being an employee doesn't make it easier to win a product liability lawsuit against your employer.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.