Skip to main content

Benita Renee Yocum v. Jason Richard Yocum

Tenn. Ct. App.December 15, 2015No. E2015-00086-COA-R3-CV
Mixed ResultExelis Mission Systems$10,500 awarded
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Judge Thomas R. Frierson, II
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

In this divorce appeal, the court affirmed most of the trial court's judgment including alimony, property distribution, and attorney's fees, but vacated the child support award and remanded for recalculation because no income shares worksheet was attached to the final judgment.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case was actually a divorce proceeding between Benita Renee Yocum and Jason Richard Yocum, not a typical employment law dispute. One of the parties worked for Exelis Mission Systems. During their divorce, the court had to determine financial matters including alimony, property division, child support, and attorney's fees. The couple appealed the trial court's decisions on these issues. **What the Court Decided** The appeals court mostly upheld the original divorce judgment, including the decisions about alimony payments, how property would be divided between the former spouses, and attorney's fees. However, the court found one significant problem: the child support calculation was incomplete because it lacked a required income worksheet. The court sent this issue back to the lower court to properly recalculate child support with the correct documentation. **Why This Matters for Workers** While this wasn't a workplace dispute, it shows how employment income affects family court proceedings. When workers go through divorce, courts carefully examine wages and benefits to determine support obligations. Proper documentation of income is crucial in these cases, as incomplete financial records can delay final judgments and require additional court proceedings.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.