Skip to main content

McCarthy-O'Keefe v. Local 295/851 IBT Employer Group Pension Trust Fund

2nd CircuitMay 11, 2016No. 15-907
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Walker, Calabresi, Hall
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

The Second Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the pension fund defendants, upholding the denial of the plaintiff's ERISA benefits claim for pension fund eligibility.

What This Ruling Means

**Pension Trust Fund Dispute - McCarthy-O'Keefe v. Local 295/851 IBT** This case involved a dispute between a worker named McCarthy-O'Keefe and a pension trust fund managed by Local 295/851 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT). The worker challenged decisions made by the pension fund, likely regarding benefit calculations, eligibility, or payment of retirement benefits they believed they were entitled to receive. The case was decided by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in May 2016. However, the specific details of the court's ruling and the final outcome are not available in the case summary provided. **What This Means for Workers:** This case highlights the ongoing challenges workers face when dealing with pension trust funds. Even when workers contribute to pension plans through their union membership or employment, disputes can arise over benefit amounts, eligibility requirements, or fund administration. Workers have the right to challenge pension fund decisions in court when they believe their benefits have been wrongly denied or calculated. The fact that this case reached the federal appeals court level shows that pension disputes can be complex legal matters that may require significant time and resources to resolve.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.