Skip to main content

Sara J.T. Behr v. Maine Public Employees Retirement System

Me.June 14, 2016No. Docket Ken-15-395
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Saufley, Alexander, Gorman, Jabar, Hjelm, Humphrey
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Failure to Accommodate

Outcome

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court affirmed the Board's denial of Behr's application for disability retirement benefits, finding that the record did not compel a finding that she met her burden to prove it was impossible to perform her job duties due to fibromyalgia.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** Sara Behr worked for the Maine Public Employees Retirement System and suffered from fibromyalgia, a chronic condition that causes widespread pain and fatigue. She applied for disability retirement benefits, claiming her fibromyalgia made it impossible for her to perform her job duties. The retirement system's board denied her application, so she challenged this decision in court. **What the Court Decided** The Maine Supreme Judicial Court sided with the retirement system. The court found that Behr had not provided enough evidence to prove her fibromyalgia completely prevented her from doing her job. The court upheld the board's decision to deny her disability retirement benefits. **Why This Matters for Workers** This case shows how challenging it can be for workers to qualify for disability retirement benefits, especially with conditions like fibromyalgia that can be difficult to measure objectively. Workers seeking disability benefits must provide strong medical evidence and detailed documentation showing their condition makes it truly impossible to perform their job duties. Simply having a medical condition isn't enough—workers must prove the condition completely prevents them from working in their specific role.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Similar Rulings

Bocchino
MESUPERCTSep 2019
Defendant Win
Marks
MESUPERCTAug 2018
Plaintiff Win
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier Church
D.C. CircuitJul 1997
Remanded
People in re S.L. and A.L
COLOCTAPPDec 2017

The Rio Blanco County Department of Human Services (Department) became involved with the parents in this case as a result of concerns about the children's welfare due to the condition of the family home, the parents' use of methamphetamine, and criminal cases involving the parents. Attempts at voluntary services failed, and on the Department's petition for dependency and neglect, the district court ultimately terminated the parents' rights. On appeal, the parents contended that the Department failed to make reasonable efforts to reunify them with their children. Specifically, the parents contended that the Department did not give them sufficient time to complete the services under their treatment plans and failed to accommodate their drug testing needs. The termination hearing was not held until more than a year after the motion to terminate was filed. For nine months before the motion to terminate was filed, the Department provided numerous services to the parents, including substance abuse therapy, therapeutic visitation supervision, drug abuse monitoring, and a parental capacity evaluation. The Department also provided counseling for the children. Both parents missed drug tests and tested positive during the testing period, and both were arrested for possession of methamphetamine during the pendency of the case. The Department made reasonable accommodations to meet the parents' needs and the parents had sufficient time to comply with their treatment plans. The record supports the trial court's findings that termination was appropriate because (1) the court-approved appropriate treatment plan had not been complied with by the parents or had not been successful in rehabilitating them (2) the parents were unfit and (3) the conduct or condition of the parents was unlikely to change within a reasonable time. Father also contended that the trial court's decision to interview the 9-year-old twin children together in chambers fundamentally and seriously affected the basi

Defendant Win
Shelley Savage v. Glendale Union High School, District No. 205, Maricopa County
9th CircuitSep 2003
Plaintiff Win

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.