Skip to main content

Rosemary Garity v. Apwu National Labor Org.

9th CircuitJuly 5, 2016No. 13-15195Cited 269 times
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
Farris, Bybee, Smith
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal
State
Nevada

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

DiscriminationRetaliationFailure to Accommodate

Outcome

The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's dismissal of disability discrimination and retaliation claims against a union under the ADA, holding that a prima facie disability discrimination claim does not require proof of breach of duty of fair representation. The case was remanded for further proceedings.

What This Ruling Means

**Worker's Case Against Union Dismissed by Appeals Court** Rosemary Garity filed a lawsuit against the APWU National Labor Organization (American Postal Workers Union) over an employment-related dispute. The specific details of what happened between Garity and the union that led to her lawsuit are not clear from the available information, but it involved some kind of workplace issue that she felt warranted legal action. The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed Garity's case entirely. This means the court threw out her lawsuit without deciding whether her claims had merit. The dismissal appears to have been based on procedural issues or questions about whether the federal court had the authority to hear this particular type of case, rather than the court ruling that Garity was wrong on the facts. For workers, this case highlights the importance of understanding proper legal procedures when filing lawsuits against unions or employers. Even if someone believes they have been wronged, cases can be dismissed if they're filed in the wrong court, miss important deadlines, or don't follow required steps. Workers considering legal action should consult with attorneys who understand employment law to ensure their cases are properly filed and have the best chance of being heard.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.