Skip to main content

State Wide Grievance Comm. v. Timbers, No. Cv99-0171925s (Aug. 2, 2000)

Conn. Super. Ct.August 2, 2000No. No. CV99-0171925S
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
KARAZIN, JUDGE.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
bench trial

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Outcome

Attorney John Timbers was found to have violated Rules 1.4 and 1.5(c) of the Connecticut Rules of Professional Conduct by failing to put a contingent fee agreement in writing and failing to keep his client reasonably informed about fees. He was suspended from the practice of law for six months.

What This Ruling Means

**What Happened** This case involved attorney John Timbers, who got into trouble with Connecticut's legal oversight committee for how he handled his business relationship with a client. The committee found that Timbers broke professional rules in two ways: he failed to put a fee agreement in writing when he agreed to take a percentage of any money his client won, and he didn't properly communicate with his client about what fees would be charged for his legal services. **What the Court Decided** The court ruled against Timbers and suspended him from practicing law for six months. The court found that he violated Connecticut's professional conduct rules that require lawyers to have written fee agreements and to keep clients informed about costs. **Why This Matters for Workers** This ruling reinforces important protections for people who hire lawyers, including workers seeking legal help for employment issues. It shows that lawyers must be transparent about their fees and put agreements in writing. If you're a worker considering hiring an attorney for workplace problems, you have the right to receive clear, written information about what you'll be charged and how fees will be calculated.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.