Skip to main content

Tilcon, Inc. v. First Union Nat'l Bank, No. X03cv980489997s (May 24, 2001)

Conn. Super. Ct.May 24, 2001No. No. X03 CV98 0489997S
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
AURIGEMMA, JUDGE.
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Unpublished
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
motion to dismiss

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Breach of Contract

Outcome

The court granted Unitemp's motion to strike on Counts Two, Three, Four, and Six, but denied the motion on Count One (partially) and Count Five. Count One was struck insofar as it sought recovery for 'potential liability' but allowed to proceed for attorneys' fees and defense costs.

What This Ruling Means

This case involved a dispute between Tilcon, Inc. and Unitemp Personnel, Inc., a staffing agency, over a contract disagreement. Tilcon sued Unitemp claiming the staffing company breached their contract, seeking money for potential future liability and other damages. The court made a mixed ruling on Unitemp's request to dismiss various parts of Tilcon's lawsuit. The judge threw out most of Tilcon's claims (Counts Two, Three, Four, and Six) and partially dismissed another claim (Count One). However, the court allowed Tilcon to continue pursuing attorney's fees and defense costs under Count One, and permitted Count Five to move forward. Importantly, the court rejected Tilcon's attempt to recover money for "potential liability" - meaning they couldn't sue for damages that might happen in the future but hadn't actually occurred yet. For workers, this case highlights how staffing agencies and their clients can end up in legal disputes over contract terms. While the specific details favor the staffing company here, it shows that temporary workers may sometimes find themselves caught between disagreeing companies. Workers should understand that their rights and protections may depend on contracts they never see between staffing agencies and client companies.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.