Skip to main content

Daniel v. Laboratory Corp. of America

NCWORKCOMPCOMDecember 10, 2008No. I.C. NOS. 582704 582705.
Facing something similar at work?Check your rights — free, private, no sign-up

Case Details

Judge(s)
<center> OPINION AND AWARD for the Full Commission by BERNADINE S. BALLANCE, Commissioner, N.C. Industrial Commission.</center>
Status — whether other courts must follow this ruling
Published
Procedural Posture — the stage the case had reached
appeal

Related Laws

No specific laws identified for this ruling.

Claim Types

Wrongful Termination

Outcome

The Full Commission reversed the Deputy Commissioner's decision and found plaintiff's foot condition to be a compensable occupational disease resulting from repetitive stress in her GCMS operator position, awarding benefits including medical treatment and temporary total disability.

What This Ruling Means

**Daniel v. Laboratory Corporation of America: Worker Wins Compensation for Foot Injury** This case involved a worker who developed a foot condition while working as a laboratory operator at Laboratory Corporation of America. The employee claimed her foot problems were caused by the repetitive stress of standing and performing her job duties as a GCMS (gas chromatography-mass spectrometry) operator. She filed for workers' compensation benefits, arguing that her foot condition was a work-related occupational disease. Initially, a Deputy Commissioner denied her claim. However, the worker appealed this decision to the Full Commission, which is a higher level of review in the workers' compensation system. The Full Commission reversed the original decision and ruled in favor of the worker. They determined that her foot condition was indeed a compensable occupational disease caused by the repetitive stress of her job duties. As a result, she was awarded workers' compensation benefits including coverage for medical treatment and temporary total disability payments. This ruling is significant for workers because it shows that repetitive stress injuries, even those affecting feet from prolonged standing, can qualify as work-related occupational diseases. Workers who develop conditions from repetitive job activities may be entitled to workers' compensation benefits, even if their initial claims are denied.

This summary was generated to explain the ruling in plain English and is not legal advice.

Browse Related

Facing something similar at work?

Court rulings like this one are useful, but every situation is different. Take 2 minutes to see which laws may protect you — it's free, private, and no account is required to start.

This ruling information is sourced from public court records via CourtListener.com. Case outcomes, claim types, and summaries are extracted using AI analysis and may be incomplete or inaccurate. It is provided for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.

See something wrong, or named in this ruling and want it corrected or redacted? Request a correction.